Part 4 of 4 in Abundant Intelligence
← PrevNext →

What remains when machines handle everything?

The question isn't whether AI will do your job. It is what you will do when work becomes optional.

For the entire arc of human history, work meant survival. Labor produced value, value produced income, and income kept you alive. Work and survival were fused together, the central organizing fact of human existence.

That link is breaking.

It won't happen overnight, and it won't happen evenly. But as AI absorbs knowledge work and robotics solves physical labor, the connection between effort and survival weakens. Eventually, it snaps.

This forces us to confront a question we have never had to answer at scale: What happens when work stops being necessary?


The photography precedent

This has happened before.

For centuries, painters were valued for their technical skill, the ability to represent reality accurately on canvas. Portraits commanded high prices because capturing a likeness required years of rigorous training. Technical execution was the point.

Then cameras arrived.

Suddenly, perfect visual representation became trivial. Instant. Mechanical. Anyone could capture reality exactly as it appeared.

Did painting die? No. It was liberated.

Painters stopped competing with reality and started exploring what cameras couldn't capture: emotion, interpretation, abstraction, meaning. Art stopped being about technical accuracy and became about expression and intention. The Impressionists, the Expressionists, the entire trajectory of modern art, all were made possible because mechanical reproduction freed painters from the burden of documentation.

AI is doing the same thing to work itself.

When execution becomes cheap, when anyone can produce competent writing, analysis, design, code, the question shifts from "how well can you do this?" to "why are you doing this at all?"

The economy starts rewarding intention over technique. Meaning over metrics. Genuine contribution over credentials.


Work becomes signal

Today, when someone says "I am a lawyer" or "I work in finance," it tells you almost nothing about who they are. Are they passionate about justice? Fascinated by markets? Or just paying off student loans?

You can't tell. Work is conflated with economic necessity. Motivation is obscured.

When survival is decoupled from employment, work transforms into a signal.

If someone chooses to spend their finite time navigating legal complexity when they don't have to, it is because they genuinely care. The choice itself becomes the information.

This doesn't mean people stop working. It means motivation shifts from external compulsion to internal drive.

  • From "I have to" to "I want to."
  • From obligation to expression.

The gym paradox

Here is a pattern that predicts what is coming.

For millennia, physical strength was necessary for survival. Farming required muscle. Building required power. If you were weak, you didn't eat.

Then machines arrived. Tractors replaced muscle. Factories automated manufacturing. Physical strength stopped being necessary for survival.

Did humans stop caring about physical fitness?

The opposite happened. We built gyms. We created entire industries around voluntary physical exertion. We invented marathons, CrossFit, and obstacle courses. People now pay money to exhaust themselves physically, precisely because they don't have to.

What is no longer necessary for survival becomes valued for meaning and identity.

The same shift is coming for mental effort.

You don't have to memorize facts; AI recalls everything. You don't have to solve complex math; AI computes perfectly.

But choosing to think deeply when you could delegate, choosing to struggle with a problem when you could just ask for the answer, becomes meaningful because it is optional.

Intellectual effort transforms from an obligation to an identity. From "I think to get paid" to "I think because it makes me who I am."


The partnership

As AI capabilities expand, the usual framing is competitive: Will AI replace us?

This assumes a zero-sum game. The future is not about replacement; it is about complementarity.

  • AI excels at: Processing information, recognizing patterns, optimizing systems, and executing with perfect consistency at scale.
  • Humans excel at: Embodied experience, emotional depth, contextual judgment, and caring about outcomes for reasons that aren't rational.

AI can manage global logistics, optimize energy grids, and coordinate supply chains. Humans provide the meaning and direction. We decide what is worth optimizing for. We care about the results in ways algorithms cannot, because caring is not a computation.

Consider the partnership between humans and dogs. Neither species became obsolete. Dogs brought heightened senses and loyalty; humans brought tools and planning. Together, both became more capable.

AI and humans are forming a similar symbiosis. AI manages the infrastructure of civilization. Humans fill it with purpose.


The great clearing

Imagine if the administrative overhead of modern life simply vanished.

The hours spent navigating bureaucracy. The scheduling. The logistics. The password management. The cognitive load that drains energy without creating meaning.

What would you do with that freed attention?

Maybe you would focus on what feels authentically human. Deep relationships. Community. Creating things because they express who you are. Experiencing life directly rather than managing its complexity.

Not because economic circumstances force you to. But because you finally can.


The question you are not ready to answer

This shift surfaces something uncomfortable.

If you didn't need money to survive, what would you actually do with your time?

Many people do not know. They have never had to answer it. Work has always been a necessity, not a choice. The idea of freely choosing your purpose feels foreign. Even frightening.

But this is precisely the question the future poses.

When machines handle necessity, human purpose becomes the real work.

Strip away everything that can be automated, and what remains?

  • Embodied presence.
  • Being there for someone who needs you.
  • Emotional connection.
  • Making art because it feels true.
  • Helping someone simply because you want to.

These are not consolation prizes we settle for because we can't compete with AI. These are the things that actually make life worth living.


The shift

The transformations in this series are connected.

  1. When execution becomes cheap, the middle collapses. Value moves to the extremes: pure judgment or pure humanity.
  2. When knowledge becomes free, interpretation becomes valuable. It's not what you know, but how you play the notes.
  3. When work stops being about survival, it becomes about expression.

The world is shifting from rewarding what you can do to rewarding who you are, your judgment, your taste, your relationships, your capacity for care.


Your turn

You don't need permission to participate in this shift. The tools exist. The intelligence is available.

What is required is answering the uncomfortable questions:

  • What would you do if you didn't need the money?
  • What work would you choose as expression rather than obligation?
  • What do you care about enough to pursue when no one is forcing you?

The future isn't about humans becoming obsolete. It is about humans finally being free to focus on what we were built for, while machines handle what they were built for.

Not competition. Partnership. Not replacement. Liberation.

The revolution isn't coming. You are in it.

The only question is whether you will drift through it passively, or use it deliberately to build a life around what actually matters.

That answer is yours to write.

What remains when machines handle everything? | Jean-Baptiste Terrazzoni